I was reading through my runescape diary and reminiscing about old clans. Many times in history a clan has closed, and later reopened either under identical leadership or similar leadership.
More often than not the remade clan is not as glamorous/strong as the predecessor, but there are exceptions. Using 2015 examples both RoT and DI remakes are much weaker than they were before they closed. However, looking at a clan such as VR they are much stronger than the predecessors (Hostile/Awaken --> SA1/2)
Why are remakes normally worse than the original/predecessor?
Which remake would you say is the most successful? (Historically)
Hopefully someone can explain why remakes are normally worse... Is it because they get filled with worse members who would not have made the grade the first time around? That's what i'm thinking.
thanks for your answers to this puzzle
More often than not the remade clan is not as glamorous/strong as the predecessor, but there are exceptions. Using 2015 examples both RoT and DI remakes are much weaker than they were before they closed. However, looking at a clan such as VR they are much stronger than the predecessors (Hostile/Awaken --> SA1/2)
Why are remakes normally worse than the original/predecessor?
Which remake would you say is the most successful? (Historically)
Hopefully someone can explain why remakes are normally worse... Is it because they get filled with worse members who would not have made the grade the first time around? That's what i'm thinking.
thanks for your answers to this puzzle